Driving a Commercial Motor Vehicle without a Seatbelt in Arizona
49 CFR 392.16
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration requires that commercial drivers to wear seat belts. See 49 CFR 392.16:
(a) Drivers. No driver shall operate a commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle, that has a seat belt assembly installed at the driver’s seat unless the driver is properly restrained by the seat belt assembly.
(b) Passengers. No driver shall operate a property-carrying commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver to operate a property-carrying commercial motor vehicle, that has seat belt assemblies installed at the seats for other occupants of the vehicle unless all other occupants are properly restrained by such seat belt assemblies.
CALL NOW OR UPLOAD YOUR TICKET
You will note that only passengers in a “property-carrying commercial motor vehicle” are required to wear a seat belt. The passengers in a commercial motor vehicle that is designed to carry passengers and not property – think tour bus – are not required to wear seatbelts. I’m unclear what the logic here is, but nevertheless, this is what we have to work with.
Consequences of violating 49 CFR 392.16
A violation of 49 CFR 392.16 is often a criminal charge according to A.R.S. 28-5240, which states:
A. In addition to civil penalties imposed under this chapter, a motor carrier, shipper or manufacturer who operates or causes to be operated a commercial motor vehicle in violation of this chapter or who knowingly violates or knowingly fails to comply with any provision of this chapter or with any rule adopted pursuant to this chapter is guilty of:
1. A class 2 misdemeanor for a first offense.
2. A class 1 misdemeanor for a second offense.
3. A class 6 felony for any subsequent offense.
For a first offense, which would be charged as a class 2 misdemeanor, there is the potential for up to a $750 fine plus surcharges of $630, up to 4 months in jail, and probation. In practice, most drivers will face a fine and the misdemeanor conviction; jail time and probation are unlikely.
We do seem this charged as a civil violation sometimes. Instead of being charged as CFR 392.16, it would instead be charged as FMC 392.16.
Defenses
A big problem with these cases is the opportunity for the police officer to observe the driver of a commercial vehicle while everyone is driving. Did the police officer actually see the driver driving without a seat belt? Did the driver remove his seat belt after he had stopped but before the cop came to the window? A similar problem exists with the using a hand held mobile device and texting while driving violations.
Schedule a Free Consultation
Email us below and we’ll reach out.
Latest Blog Posts
Traffic Stops and the Drug Dog
A few years ago, I was driving through Colorado on my way home to Arizona. I was traveling the speed limit, but was nevertheless pulled over by a cop for allegedly exceeding the speed limit by 2 mph. The officer asked me to exit my vehicle and issued me a warning. As the traffic stop appeared to be ending, the cop began with a series of questions: do you have any weapons, do you have any drugs, etc. I answered in the negative.
Tucson Voters Ban Red Light Cameras
Earlier this year, a group called Tucson Traffic Justice collected 50,000 signatures in support of a petition to place a proposition on the fall ballot to ban red light cameras. The city council voted unanimously to place Proposition 201 on the ballot and let the voters decide the fate of Tucson’s red light cameras. Following the November 3rd election, voters overwhelmingly voted to ban red light cameras in Tucson with approximately 65% of voters supporting the proposition.